Why Security Engineers Struggle with Data Pipelines

Picture this: It's 3 AM. Your SIEM is screaming about a potential breach. But, instead of hunting threats, your security engineer is knee-deep in parsing errors, wrestling with broken log formats, and frantically writing custom rules to make sense of vendor data that changed overnight, AGAIN!

The unfortunate truth of cybersecurity isn't the sophistication of attacks, it's that most security teams spend over 50% of their time fighting their own data instead of the actual threats.

‍

Every day, terabytes of security logs flood in: JSON from cloud services, syslog from network devices, CEF from security tools, OTEL from applications, and dozens of proprietary vendor formats. Before your team can even think about threat detection, they're stuck building normalization rules, writing custom parsers, and playing an endless game of whack-a-mole with schema drift.

Here's the kicker: Traditional data pipelines weren't built for security. They were designed for batch analysis with security bolted on as an afterthought. The result? Dangerous blind spots, false positives flooding your SOC, and your best security minds wasting their expertise on data plumbing instead of protecting your organization.

‍

Garbage in, garbage out

In cybersecurity, garbage data is the difference between detection and disaster. Traditional pipelines were not designed with security as a primary goal. They were built for batch analysis, with security as an afterthought. These pipelines struggle to handle unstructured log formats and enrichment at scale, making it difficult to deliver clean, actionable data for real-time detection. On top of that, every transformation step introduces latency, creating dangerous blind spots where threats can slip by unnoticed.

This manual approach is slow, resource-draining, and keeps teams from focusing on real security outcomes. This is where traditional pipeline management is failing today.

‍

Automated Data Parsing : Way forward for Security Teams

At DataBahn, we built Cruz to solve this problem with one defining principle: automated data parsing must be the foundation of modern data pipeline management.

Instead of requiring manual scripts or rulebooks, Cruz uses agentic AI to autonomously parse, detect, and normalize telemetry at scale. This means:

• Logs are ingested in any format and parsed instantly.
• Schema drift is identified and corrected in real time.
• Pipelines stay resilient without constant engineering intervention.

With Cruz, data parsing is no longer a manual bottleneck; it’s an automated capability baked into the pipeline layer.

‍

How does Automated Data Parsing Work?

Ingest Anywhere, Anytime

Cruz connects to any source : firewalls, EDRs, SaaS apps, cloud workloads, and IoT sensors without predefined parsing rules.

Automated Parsing and Normalization

Using machine learning models trained on millions of log structures, Cruz identifies data formats dynamically and parses them into structured JSON or other formats. No manual normalisation required.

Auto-Heal Schema Drift

When vendors add, remove, or rename fields, Cruz automatically adjusts parsing and normalization logic, ensuring pipelines don’t break.

Enrich Before Delivery

Parsed logs can be enriched with metadata like geo-IP, user identity, or asset context, making downstream analysis smarter from the start.

‍

The Impact of Automated Data Parsing for Enterprises

The biggest challenge in today’s SOCs and observability teams isn’t lack of data; it’s unusable data. Logs trapped in broken formats slow everything down. Cruz eliminates this barrier with automated parsing at the pipeline layer. It means security engineers can finally focus on detection, response, and strategy, keeping alert fatigue at bay.

Security and observability teams using Cruz see:

• Up to 80% less time wasted on manual parsing and normalization
• 2–3x faster MTTR (mean time to resolution)
• Scalable pipelines across hundreds of sources, formats, and vendors

With Cruz, pipelines don’t just move data; they transform messy logs into actionable intelligence automatically. This is data pipeline management redefined: pipelines that are resilient, compliant, and fully autonomous. Experience the future of data pipeline management here.

‍

SIEM migration is a high-stakes project. Whether you are moving from a legacy on-prem SIEM to a cloud-native platform, or changing vendors for better performance, flexibility, or cost efficiency, more security leaders are finding themselves at this inflection point. The benefits look clear on paper, however, in practice, the path to get there is rarely straightforward.

SIEM migrations often drag on for months. They break critical detections, strain engineering teams with duplicate pipelines, and blow past the budgets set. The work is not just about switching platforms. It is about preserving threat coverage, maintaining compliance, and keeping the SOC running without gaps. And let’s not forget, the challenge of testing multiple SIEMs before making the switch and, what should be a forward-looking upgrade, can quickly turn into a drawn-out struggle.

In this blog, we’ll explore how security teams can approach SIEM migration in a way that reduces risk, shortens timelines, and avoids costly surprises.

What Makes a SIEM Migration Difficult and How to Prepare

Even with a clear end goal, SIEM migration is rarely straightforward. It’s a project that touches every part of the SOC, from ingestion pipelines to detection logic, and small oversights early on can turn into major setbacks later. These are some of the most common challenges security teams face when making the switch.

Data format and ingestion mismatches
Every SIEM has its own log formats, field mappings, and parsing rules. Moving sources over often means reworking normalization, parsers, and enrichment processes, all while keeping the old system running.

Detection logic that doesn’t transfer cleanly
Rules built for one SIEM often fail in another due to differences in correlation methods, query languages, or built-in content. This can cause missed alerts or floods of false positives during migration.

The operational weight of a dual run
Running the old and new SIEM in parallel is almost always required, but it doubles the workload. Teams must maintain two sets of pipelines and dashboards while monitoring for gaps or inconsistencies.

Rushed or incomplete evaluation before migration
Many teams struggle to properly test multiple SIEMs with realistic data, either because of engineering effort or data sensitivity. When evaluation is rushed or skipped, ingest cost issues, coverage gaps, or integration problems often surface mid-migration. A thorough evaluation with representative data helps avoid these surprises.  

In our upcoming SIEM Migration Evaluation Checklist, we’ll share the key criteria to test before you commit to a migration, from log schema compatibility and detection performance to ingestion costs and integration fit.

How DataBahn Reinvents SIEM Migration with a Security Data Fabric

Many of the challenges that slow or derail SIEM migration come down to one thing: a lack of control over the data layer. DataBahn’s Security Data Fabric addresses this by separating data collection and routing from the SIEM itself, giving teams the flexibility to move, test, and optimize data without being tied to a single platform.

Ingest once, deliver anywhere
Connect your sources to a single, neutral pipeline that streams data simultaneously to both your old and new SIEMs. With our new Smart Agent, you can capture data using the most effective method for each source — deploying a lightweight, programmable agent where endpoint visibility or low latency is critical or a hybrid model where agentless collection suffices. This flexibility lets you onboard sources quickly without rebuilding agents or parsers for each SIEM.

Native format delivery
Route logs in the exact schema each SIEM expects, whether that’s Splunk CIM, Elastic UDM, OCSF, or a proprietary model, without custom scripting. Automated transformation ensures each destination gets the data it can parse and enrich without errors or loss of fidelity.

Dual-run without the overhead
Stream identical data to both environments in real time while continuously monitoring pipeline health. Adjust routing or transformations on the fly so both SIEMs stay in sync through the cutover, without doubling engineering work.

AI-powered data relevance filtering
Automatically identify and forward only security-relevant events to your SIEM, while routing non-critical logs into cold storage for compliance. This reduces ingest costs and alert fatigue while keeping a complete forensic archive available when needed.

Safe, representative evaluation
Send real or synthetic log streams to candidate SIEMs for side-by-side testing without risking sensitive data. This lets you validate performance, rule compatibility, and integration fit before committing to a migration.

Unified Migration Workflow with DataBahn

When you own the data layer, migration becomes a sequence of controlled steps instead of a risky, ad hoc event. DataBahn’s workflow keeps both old and new SIEMs fully operational during the transition, letting you validate detection parity, performance, and cost efficiency before the final switch.  

With this workflow, migration becomes a controlled, reversible process instead of a risky, one-time event. You keep your SOC fully operational while gaining the freedom to test and adapt at every stage.

For a deeper look at this process, explore our SIEM Migration use case overview —  from the problems it solves to how it works, with key capabilities and outcomes.

Key Success Metrics for a SIEM Migration

Successful SIEM migrations aren’t judged only by whether the cutover happens on time. The real measure is whether your SOC emerges more efficient, more accurate in detection, and more resilient to change. Those gains are often lost when migrations are rushed or handled ad hoc, but by putting control of the data pipeline at the center of your migration strategy, they become the natural outcome.

• Lower migration costs by eliminating duplicate ingestion setups, reducing vendor-specific engineering, and avoiding expensive reprocessing when formats don’t align.

• Faster timelines because sources are onboarded once, and transformations are handled automatically in the pipeline, not rebuilt for each SIEM.

• Detection parity from day one in the new SIEM, with side-by-side validation ensuring that existing detections still trigger as expected.

• Regulatory compliance by keeping a complete, audit-ready archive of all security telemetry, even as you change platforms.

• Future flexibility to evaluate, run in parallel, or even switch SIEMs again without having to rebuild your ingestion layer from scratch.

These outcomes are not just migration wins, they set up your SOC for long-term agility in a fast-changing security technology landscape.

Making SIEM Migration Predictable

SIEM migration will always be a high-stakes project for any security team, but it doesn’t have to be disruptive or risky. When you control your data pipeline from end to end, you maintain visibility, detection accuracy, and operational resilience even as you transition systems.

Your migration risk goes up when precursor evaluation relies on small or unrepresentative datasets or when evaluation criteria are unclear. According to industry experts, many organizations launch SIEM pilots without predefined benchmarks or comprehensive testing, leading to gaps in coverage, compatibility, or cost that surface only midway through migration.

To help avoid that level of disruption, we’ll be sharing a SIEM Evaluation Checklist for modern enterprises — a practical guide to running a complete and realistic evaluation before you commit to a migration.

Whether you’re moving to the cloud, consolidating tools, or preparing for your first migration in years, pairing a controlled data pipeline with a disciplined evaluation process positions you to lead the migration smoothly, securely, and confidently.

Download our SIEM Migration one-pager for a concise, shareable summary of the workflow, benefits, and key considerations.

Black Hat 2025: Where Community Meets Innovation

The air outside is a wall of heat. Inside, the Mandalay Bay convention floor hums with thousands of conversations, security researchers debating zero-days, vendors unveiling new tools, and old friends spotting each other across the crowd. It’s loud, chaotic, and absolutely electric!  

For us at Databahn, Black Hat isn’t just a showcase of cutting-edge research and product launches. It’s where the heartbeat of the cybersecurity community comes alive in the handshakes, the hallway chats, and the unexpected reunions that remind us why we’re here in the first place.

From security engineers and researchers to marketers, event organizers, and community builders, every role plays a part in making this event what it is. Like RSAC, Black Hat feels less like a trade show and more like a reunion, one where we share new ideas, catch up with longtime peers, and recognize the often-unsung contributors who quietly keep the cybersecurity world moving.

AI and Telemetry Take Center Stage

While the people are the soul of Black Hat, the conversations this year reflected a major shift in technology priorities: the role of telemetry in the AI era.

Why Telemetry Matters More Than Ever

AI, autonomous agents, and APIs are transforming security operations faster than ever before. But their effectiveness hinges on the quality of the data they consume. Modern detection, response, analytics, and compliance workflows all depend on telemetry that is:

• Selective: capturing only what matters ‍
• Low-latency: delivering it in near-real time ‍
• Structured: making it usable for SIEMs, data lakes, analytics, and AI models

Introducing the Smart Agent for the Modern Enterprise

We took this challenge head-on at Black Hat with the launch of our Smart Agent: a lightweight, programmable collection layer designed to bring policy, precision, and platform awareness to endpoint telemetry.

• Reduce Agent Sprawl: Minimize deployment overhead and avoid tool bloat ‍
• Lower Hidden Costs: Prevent over-collection and unnecessary storage expenses ‍
• Adapt to Any Environment: Tailor data collection to asset type, latency requirements, and downstream use cases

Think of it as a precision instrument for your security data that turns telemetry from a bottleneck into a force multiplier.

Breaking the Agent vs. Agentless Binary

For years, the industry has debated: agent or agentless? At Databahn.ai, we see this as a false binary. Real-world environments require both approaches, deployed intelligently based on:

• Asset type
• Risk profile
• Latency sensitivity
• Compliance requirements

The Smart Agent gives security teams that flexibility without forcing trade-offs. Learn more about our approach here.

Empowering Teams Through Smarter Technology  

As we push the envelope in telemetry, our goal remains the same: build the platform that enables people to do their best work. Because in cybersecurity, the human element isn’t just important; it’s irreplaceable. If you missed us at Black Hat, let’s talk about how the Smart Agents can help your team cut data waste, improve precision, and stay ahead of evolving threats.